USAC Racing Forum
November 27, 2014, 06:38:04 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: SMF - Just Installed!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: USAC - why? my statement  (Read 19373 times)
Thomason
Rookie
*
Posts: 5


« on: January 28, 2009, 11:15:34 PM »

I have never posted to a forum before because I never felt the need to share my thoughts or get caught up in the bantering that normally deteriorates into name calling.  This will be long winded because I have all of these pent up thoughts that need to come out.  I am the president of the new Indy .25 club.  My resume’ includes two years as president of Mini Indy and four out of my five years in quarter midgets have been spent as an officer or Board member of that club.  I’ve had a lot of people question the way that I’ve done things in ear bending tirades, vicious e-mails, threats, etc. , but that all just kind of comes with the territory in this kid oriented sport.  I got over it.  The point of this post is not to initiate debate, finger pointing or name calling, but just to state how I got to this point and why. I don't intend to respond or to post again.
 
First, the things that are not my motivation in doing this:
    Ass kissing the USAC officials to further my son’s racing career.  My son is a fine driver, but he has one, maybe two years of .25 racing and then whatever he does in the way of racing won’t be in USAC events.  He won’t be emancipated to run midgets or sprints.  He’s a smart kid with a lot of interests.
   Personal revenge against a club that refused to accept the way I wanted to do things.  Over the last 5 years, the only person who has a claim to more time, sweat, effort, money and love invested in Mini Indy than me is my wife, Denise.  It was never done for recognition, but only to provide a great racing experience for the kids, many times to the detriment of mine.  Although things are certainly nasty and becoming personal towards us from Mini Indy, this isn’t a personal issue.  I firmly believe that USAC is a better way of doing things….read on.

   Quarter midget racing is a wonderful sport and, basically, racing is racing.  The QMA structure is all volunteer, which, in theory, is a wonderful way to do things.  But human nature, as it is, will always have 10% of the people doing 90% of the work.  On a regional or national level, I’m sure every one of those individuals is a fine person with the best of intentions, putting in countless hours “for the kids”.  Most people are smart enough not to get involved in the politics of the sport, but the novice families wonder why everyone is always mad.  I got involved before I knew any better.
   I attended four straight January Region 4 presidents meetings.  Every year we sorted through 30-40 RCP’s for approval.  Every year it seemed that we debated the same issues:  division weights, tires, seat belts, leaning out, X car eligible.  It was like the movie “Groundhog Day”.  It seemed that the only changes to ever come out were things introduced on the floor at the national meeting.  Look at this year’s RCP’s…déjà vu.   Region 4’s vote carried the same weight as one-club Region 7 or two-club regions 1 and 13.  It just never changed.  People rotated in and then out, leaving their mark and moving on.  How many times did I hear “I don’t care, one more year and I’m outta here”.  It’s the nature of the structure of the organization.  I know that it’s been here 50 years, but it’s frustrating to virtually everyone that’s experienced it.  How many have left with a great racing experience, but a bittersweet personal experience?
   I didn’t ask USAC to get into the quarter midget business, but I listened and saw a better way to do things.  Sorry, I’m just like that.  I see stability in the business end and consistency in the interpretations of rules and issues because there are paid, full time people that will be there today, tomorrow and 3 years from now.  There is flexibility to race the way you want at a local level.  Their stated purpose is to market and grow the sport.  More importantly, I see a new beginning with a group of people that want to listen to the membership and make the tough decisions to let the sport evolve.  I know that there is a definite anti-USAC sentiment, especially from some of the old racers that have raced in various forms under the USAC banner. Those impressions are hard to change, but the good-old-boy administration is gone and replaced with people that genuinely want to make this work.  Call them, they'll answer the phone and return calls.  There is no doubt that they will experience growing pains and that this won’t be all roses, but they will learn, adapt and make it better.  They have to, because they will be there to answer for it.  I’ve bought into it, I want to leave the sport better for the next generation of kids and their families, simple as that. 

Rick Thomason
Indy .25 Midget Racing Club
Logged
Melmo
Veteran
**
Posts: 77



« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2009, 11:26:17 PM »

Well said!!!
Logged

Melmo In The Fast Lane!!!
race24
Rookie
*
Posts: 3


« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2009, 11:32:12 PM »

Hey Rick

You will do a great job

Good Luck

Nick Poe
Logged
ssssmoke
Guest
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2009, 11:42:25 PM »

sounds like they got the right man for the job in indy, cant wait to get there and race. good luck.
Logged
clouse55
Feature Winner
***
Posts: 104


« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2009, 11:56:28 PM »

Well done Rick, well done!!



Jeff Clouse
Logged
goffin20
National Champion
****
Posts: 319



WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2009, 12:07:47 AM »

Very well said!!!
Logged

PhilHeil
Rookie
*
Posts: 47


« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2009, 12:16:39 AM »

Sorry Rick, but I don't believe it.

If you truely wanted to do this the right way you should have let the current leadership at Mini-Indy know it was coming rather than blind siding them.  What you have done to Steve Kuhn is inexcusable.

You should have recommended that current Mini-Indy officers refrain from involvement with USAC unless they resigned from their leadership roles as Mini-Indy is currently a QMA sanctioned track.  That way you wouldn't have had Mini-Indy officers and their son's cars in the USAC booth this past weekend rather than the Mini-Indy, QMA booth where they should have been.

Your wife Denise, who you mention above, should have resigned as the Secretary of Mini-Indy as her position gives her access to confidential clubs records.  This situation certainly will lead to ethics questions.

If you had done things the right way Rick, Mini-Indy would not be facing the uncomfortable club meeting they are going to have Thursday evening to vote on impeaching your wife and another board member.

So you can say what you want about why you have done this.  But the manner in which it was done would lead one to believe this is about revenge and vindictivness.

And this is coming from a guy that likes you, your wife and your son.  A guy that supported you during your years as president of Mini-Indy.  I can only imagine what the people that didn't like you are thinking.

Phil Heil
Proud Mini-Indy Alum
Logged
Melmo
Veteran
**
Posts: 77



« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2009, 12:19:39 AM »

Phil Phil Phil I think with the statement that you just made that you should wake up and understand what's going!!! If you say that some of you people is backing USAC should get out I understand. But what I don't understand is the one and only TONY GEORGE from the INDIANAPOLIS 500 track help founded the mini-indy track and made it what it is today!!! Now Tony is backing USAC in a good way and standing by USAC!!! So all in all you should practice what you preach and understand what the mini-indy club is doing to Mr. George!!!

That's just my thoughts!!!

Also Phil you should know the whole story before you start making statements like this!!!

What you have done to Steve Kuhn is inexcusable.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2009, 12:24:49 AM by Melmo » Logged

Melmo In The Fast Lane!!!
PhilHeil
Rookie
*
Posts: 47


« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2009, 12:24:39 AM »

Phil Phil Phil I think with the statement that you just made that you should wake up and understand what's going!!! If you say that some of you people is backing USAC should get out I understand. But what I don't understand is the one and only TONY GEORGE from the INDIANAPOLIS 500 track help founded the mini-indy track and made it what it is today!!! Now Tony is backing USAC in a good way and standing by USAC!!! So all in all you should practice what you preach and understand what the mini-indy club is doing to Mr. George!!!

That's just my thoughts!!!

You already said that in another thread.

I am preaching responsibility, honesty and ethics.  Some folks involved in this mess should give 'em a try.
Logged
Melmo
Veteran
**
Posts: 77



« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2009, 12:29:13 AM »

And like I said you should know the whole story before you start barking up the wrong tree!!!
Logged

Melmo In The Fast Lane!!!
PhilHeil
Rookie
*
Posts: 47


« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2009, 12:31:10 AM »


Also Phil you should know the whole story before you start making statements like this!!!

What you have done to Steve Kuhn is inexcusable.

I do, so I can.
Logged
Melmo
Veteran
**
Posts: 77



« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2009, 12:32:27 AM »

OK!!!   Roll Eyes
Logged

Melmo In The Fast Lane!!!
PhilHeil
Rookie
*
Posts: 47


« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2009, 12:33:10 AM »

And like I said you should know the whole story before you start barking up the wrong tree!!!

You mean the whole story that Mini-Indy voted to remain QMA and that wasn't good enough for some folks so they screwed over club leadership to further their own agendas.

Yep, sounds like the whole story to me.  Wink
Logged
Melmo
Veteran
**
Posts: 77



« Reply #13 on: January 29, 2009, 12:34:20 AM »

OK!!! Roll Eyes
Logged

Melmo In The Fast Lane!!!
PhilHeil
Rookie
*
Posts: 47


« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2009, 12:37:33 AM »

OK!!!   Roll Eyes

Look Melmo (whoever you are, I sign my posts)

I have no problem with USAC.  If the membership of Mini-Indy had voted to go USAC I would have supported it.  

BUT, the membership of Mini-Indy voted to stay with QMA.  And, since they did, the leadership of Mini-Indy should have supported that decision or resigned.

I would have no problems with a Mini-Indy member associating with USAC, but not when you are an elected official of the Mini-Indy Club.

I would have had no problem with Rick signing on to be President of the new .25 Indy Club, if it had been handled correctly up front.

Why is that so difficult for you to understand?

Phil Heil
Proud Mini-indy Alum
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!